Sunday, September 4, 2016

Whiteboard Action At The Epicenter Of Learning


Third stop on my room tour at the whiteboard!
I like to think of my whiteboard as the epicenter of learning because it is a focal point for how I share information with students. All of my tables are arranged so everyone can see the whiteboard and it's often the place where our lessons begin. My whiteboard is very long so there is space for my projector to display as well as space on either side where I can write information that doesn't have to be erased during presentations. The photo above shows my agenda and a handy classroom management tool that I call the noise tracker.

First, I'll discuss the agenda. I cannot stress enough the importance of maintaining an agenda. True story: I scored a job interview (and subsequently the job) by mentioning my agenda as one of the tools I use to keep my classroom organized. The woman interviewing me over the phone even admitted that I was the only candidate who talked about one and it happened to be on the school's checklist for hiring a teacher. Win! This agenda is pretty basic because we are just starting the year. I add more details as students get deeper into projects or if I need a visual reminder to do something with the class, like return artwork, that may be forgotten if I'm caught up in the momentum of the session. Remember, I have a typical short, art teacher attention span and am excited about getting kids working with materials. Students appreciate the agenda because it lets them know what they are doing that day so they can anticipate the process better. It also alleviates some of those "what are we doing today?" questions that slow down the start of class.

"Make sure the consequence you choose is something you are willing to enforce or it will be completely ineffective."


Onto the noise tracker, which arguably has an even bigger impact on the day-to-day operations of the art room than the agenda. It's a simple tool that allows me to non-verbally communicate to the class if they are being too loud or disruptive. If the volume goes above a comfortable level or students are talking over my instructions then they lose a letter, starting with the "e". To save my voice I often remove the letter and hold it up silently until students notice and start to shush each other. If I need to, I can give them a reminder that the letter was lost because they chose to be too loud/disrespectful so they connect the consequence with their actions rather than my whimsy. When a class loses enough letters that the noise tracker reads "no" then there is no talking until the session is over - and I stick to that! No whispering, it is absolutely silent. If students are bold enough to keep talking after they've lost that privilege then I start taking minutes of recess, 5 minutes for each letter (n and o). This could be done individually or as an entire class if many people choose to disregard the loss of their talking privilege.
Make sure the consequence you choose is something you are willing to enforce or it will be completely ineffective. One of the funniest and entirely true things I learned in teacher boot camp was about consistency - it is like pregnancy, either you are (consistent) or you aren't. I find that teachers fall into inconsistency if they are uncomfortable with a procedure/expectation and then only fall back on it when the measures they ARE comfortable with have failed. Here's another thing that art teachers should always feel comfortable having in their management toolbox: art class is a privilege and the teacher's time is valuable. That privilege can and should be taken away if it's being abused, i.e. make students put away their materials early (or don't even get them out) if they cannot respect the creative environment.*
Remind students early and often that they are extremely lucky to have access to art materials because it isn't guaranteed everywhere in the US and certainly not around the world. Very likely they are scheduled to come only one or two sessions every week, if not less, making their art time even more valuable. Art teachers may feel like glorified babysitters and just a cover for homeroom teachers' planning time. The administration may reinforce this by allowing specialist classes to be overcrowded and under-resourced. But remember, someone somewhere fought for students to have access to art in your area and if the art teacher falls into the trap of believing the subject is less worthy than others the students will immediately pick up on that. 

The noise tracker isn't always a negative thing. Classes that make good choices and control their volume, demonstrate respect, and so on earn points toward the Golden Specialist award. Whichever class earns the most points in a month receives the Golden Specialist award at our monthly assembly. I have also added that classes who win the award multiple times in a year will get a special art party. I think this will be something like watching an art movie with treats or using special supplies. I can't take credit for this idea because it was already being implemented at my school. At first, I thought it was silly but the students take a lot of pride in it so I was able to build their investment in the noise tracker by linking those two things. I like this system because there is a minor time commitment in using it, the rewards are nearly free if I don't buy food for the art party, and it helps maintain a calm creative space where my head won't feel like it's going to explode. I know some of my more-sensitive students feel the same. Even the really bold ones appreciate not being yelled about their volume, which is pretty counterproductive and hypocritical if you think about it. So, instead: you get art and you get art and you get art and you get art! I'm going to continue my Oprah moment in private now...

What are some other successful behavior management techniques? What consequences work best with students to help them reflect on their behavior without being punitive (taking away recess is the unpopular last resort at my school)? Or what motivates students to stay on their best behavior?

Artfully,
Catherine
*Full disclosure: my first year of teaching was in a school in a district that purposely left a loophole in regulations about class size for specialist subjects. Enormous numbers of students could be crammed into the art/music/library/PE room (or even an auditorium if need be) to give homeroom teachers planning time to implement all of the initiatives passed down because many schools in the district were failing. The school I happened to be at was also designated as high-need because of the socioeconomic background of 99% of the students. My classes were filled with students that needed more attention, not less, but as a novice and mere human being I couldn't support my students in the way they needed. On top of that, I received tremendous pressure to just get the kids in the room and do something, anything with them because my room was next to the front office (lucky me) and the noise from students in the hallway was disruptive to administration (poor them). At a faculty meeting sometime after the start of school, my principal even gave me a congratulatory pencil because "the students finally got to make some art". It is unsurprising, then, that halfway through the year the district sent in several high-ranking administrators to support our school with academics and behavior because we were again in danger of failing the state's standardized test (which we did). I did not remain at that school after my first year but I do know that the art teacher who came after me did not allow students to make art until almost Christmas because the behavior continued to be so unmanageable. No one interfered in the teacher's decision because there was new leadership at the school.

No comments:

Post a Comment